1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 318 F.3d
  5. 318 F.3d 895 (2003)
 

DELANO FARMS CO. v. CALIFORNIA TABLE GRAPE COM'N.

No. 00-16778.

318 F.3d 895 (2003)

DELANO FARMS COMPANY, a Washington corporation; The Susan Neill Company, a sole proprietorship of Susan Neill; Lucas Bros. Partnership, a California partnership, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CALIFORNIA TABLE GRAPE COMMISSION, Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Filed January 27, 2003.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Brian C. Leighton, Clovis, CA, for the appellants.

Kendall L. Manock (argued), Robert D. Wilkinson (briefed), Baker, Manock, & Jensen, Fresno, CA, for the appellee.

Before: BRUNETTI, KLEINFELD and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

KLEINFELD, Circuit Judge.

Several grape growers object to being compelled by state law to pay money for generic advertising of grapes. The Supreme Court has issued a decision that such a program for growers of nectarines, plums, and peaches did not violate the First Amendment, but a program for mushroom growers did. The only issue in this case is whether the principle distinguishing those two cases makes the grape growers more like the nectarine, plum, and peach growers...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases