PER CURIAM.
Appellant, defendant below, appeals his convictions claiming first, that the trial court abused its discretion in certain evidentiary rulings, and second, that the trial court erred in denying his motions for judgment of acquittal. We affirm.
The evidentiary rulings at issue, were not properly preserved for our review. See Correll v. State,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.