DULUTH SUP. ERECT. v. CONCRETE RESTORERS

No. C1-02-1831.

665 N.W.2d 528 (2003)

DULUTH SUPERIOR ERECTION, INC., Respondent, v. CONCRETE RESTORERS, INC., et al., Appellants.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

July 15, 2003.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert C. Maki, Shawn B. Reed, Maki & Overom, Duluth, MN, for respondent.

Michael E. Orman, Nancy von Seggern, Orman, Nord & Spott Law Offices, Duluth, MN, for appellants Concrete Restorers, Inc., Anthony Coda, Douglas Coda, and Lake Superior Polymers, Inc.

Considered and decided by KALITOWSKI, Presiding Judge, ANDERSON, Judge, and HUSPENI, Judge.


OPINION

HUSPENI, Judge.*

In challenging the district court's grant of summary judgment, appellants argue that (1) summary judgment was inappropriate because there are genuine issues of material fact; (2) as to certain appellants, the district court erred by finding a presumption of liability and shifting the burden of proof under Minn.Stat. § 514.02 (2002); (3) the district court erred by finding that appellants breached...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases