1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. So.2d
  4. 852 So.2d
  5. 852 So.2d 327 (2003)
 

NAVA v. STATE

No. 4D03-2597.

852 So.2d 327 (2003)

Bernard NAVA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

August 6, 2003.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bernard Nava, Bushnell, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Bernard Nava challenges the trial court's denial of his rule 3.850 motion which was premised on newly discovered evidence. The trial court denied the motion as successive.

Nava's previous motion did not present the same issue. Nava v. State, 801 So.2d 945 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001). Compare Wright v. State, ___ So.2d ___, 2003 WL 21511313 (Fla. July 3, 2003). We affirm however because Nava's motion...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases