NUFFER v. MOLALLA RIVER SCHOOL DIST.

FDA 01-2; A117702.

65 P.3d 1111 (2003)

187 Or. App. 259

Chris NUFFER, Petitioner, v. MOLALLA RIVER SCHOOL DISTRICT and Fair Dismissal Appeals Board, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided April 3, 2003.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William R. Goode, Portland, argued the cause and filed the brief for petitioner.

Nancy J. Hungerford, Oregon City, argued the cause for respondent Molalla River School District. With her on the brief were Richard Cohn-Lee and The Hungerford Law Firm.

No appearance by respondent Fair Dismissal Appeals Board.

Before LANDAU, Presiding Judge, and ARMSTRONG and BREWER, Judges.


BREWER, J.

Petitioner seeks review of an order of the Fair Dismissal Appeals Board (FDAB) upholding her dismissal by the Molalla River School District (the district). She assigns error to FDAB's conclusion that the district had authority to dismiss her from her position as administrator of a public charter school. She also assigns error to several of FDAB's extensive findings of fact and to its conclusion that dismissal was not an excessive remedy. We write only to...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases