1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 827 A.2d
  5. 827 A.2d 341 (2003)
 

GORDON DEVELOPMENT v. BRADLEY

827 A.2d 341 (2003)

362 N.J. Super. 170

GORDON DEVELOPMENT GROUP, INC., A Pennsylvania Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Peter BRADLEY, Defendant-Respondent.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided July 18, 2003.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Steven D. Scherzer, Atlantic City, argued the cause for appellant (Cooper, Perskie, April, Niedelman, Wagenheim & Levenson, attorneys; Michael Gross, on the brief).

Mary J. Maudsley, Marmora, argued the cause for respondent (April, Maudsley & Goloff, attorneys; Ms. Maudsley, on the brief).

Barry S. Goodman, Woodbridge, argued the cause for amicus curiae New Jersey Association of Realtors® (Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith, Davis & Himmel, attorneys; Mr. Goodman, on the brief).

Before Judges A.A. RODRIGUEZ, WELLS and PAYNE.

The opinion of the court was delivered by RODRIGUEZ, A.A., J.A.D.

In this appeal, we hold that in a transaction involving the sale or lease of real estate, where the proposed contract has been prepared by a real estate broker, the three-day attorney review period mandated by caselaw and regulation,1 commences to run on the day after the delivery of a fully-executed contract to the buyer and the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases