IN RE UMALI

Nos. 02-15010, 02-16379.

345 F.3d 818 (2003)

In re: Rene UMALI, Debtor, Rene Umali, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Chandulal Dhanani; Hemlatabin Dhanani, Respondents-Appellees. Rene Umali, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Chandulal Dhanani; Hemlatabin Dhanani, Respondents-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Filed October 3, 2003.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Allan D. NewDelman, Esq., Phoenix, Arizona, for the appellant.

Paul S. Harter, Esq., Phoenix, Arizona, for the appellees.

Before: Warren J. Ferguson, M. Margaret McKeown, and Johnnie B. Rawlinson, Circuit Judges.


Argued and Submitted April 8, 2003 — San Francisco, California.

OPINION

RAWLINSON, Circuit Judge.

In this case we AFFIRM the district court's holding that a bankruptcy petition filed in violation of a court-imposed 180-day bar is properly excluded from the automatic stay provisions of the bankruptcy code.

I. FACTS/PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Appellant Rene Umali failed to pay approximately $1.2 million in taxes accumulated...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases