In moving, at the close of plaintiff's direct case, for judgment in its favor pursuant to CPLR 4401, defendant SCA raised nine arguments, but the trial court, in granting the motion, premised its determination on the single ground that plaintiff had not filed a timely notice of claim and did not reach defendant's remaining points. This Court thereafter reversed, reinstated the complaint and remanded the matter for a new trial (
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
KOREN-DIRESTA CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. v. NEW YORK CITY SCHOOL CONSTRUCTION AUTHORITY
2 A.D.3d 114 (2003)
767 N.Y.S.2d 601
KOREN-DIRESTA CONSTRUCTION CO., INC., Respondent, v. NEW YORK CITY SCHOOL CONSTRUCTION AUTHORITY, Appellant, et al., Defendants.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
December 2, 2003.
December 2, 2003.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
