DIRECTV, INC. v. ZINK

No. 03-CV-70893.

286 F.Supp.2d 873 (2003)

DIRECTV, Plaintiff, v. Carol ZINK, Defendant.

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division.

October 8, 2003.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Norman C. Ankers, Bradley H. Darling, Honigan, Miller, Detroit, MI, for Plaintiff Counsel.

John T. Hermann, Berkley, MI, for Defendant Counsel.


OPINION AND ORDER

FEIKENS, District Judge.

Defendant Zink brings the following eight counterclaims against DirecTV: extortion and conspiracy to commit extortion in violation of federal law; violation of State and Federal debt collection statutes; violation of Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO); engaging in deceptive trade practices; fraud and misrepresentation; defamation; and abuse of process. Plaintiff moves to dismiss all...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases