1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 667 N.W.2d
  5. 667 N.W.2d 481 (2003)
 

LINDBERG v. FASCHING

No. C7-03-242.

667 N.W.2d 481 (2003)

David LINDBERG, Respondent, v. Michael C. FASCHING, M.D., Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

August 19, 2003.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Karl L. Cambronne, Jeffrey D. Bores, Becky L. Erickson, Chestnut & Cambronne, P.A., Minneapolis, MN, for respondent.

David F. Herr, Geoffrey P. Jarpe, Kai H. Richter, Maslon, Edelman, Borman & Brand, LLP, Minneapolis, MN, for appellant.

Considered and decided by STONEBURNER, Presiding Judge, HARTEN, Judge, and MINGE, Judge.

OPINION

MINGE, Judge.

Appellant challenges a summary judgment determination that an easement over his land is valid despite the lack of a filed notice of the easement, which is required by the Marketable Title Act. The district court found that because of the scope of the easement, and because respondent and his predecessors had used the easement, they had had adequate possession of the premises to meet the exception to the filed-notice requirement of the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases