1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 832 A.2d
  5. 832 A.2d 315 (2003)
 

TEANECK v. TEANECK FIREMEN'S ASS'N.

832 A.2d 315 (2003)

177 N.J. 560

TOWNSHIP OF TEANECK, Appellant-Appellant, v. TEANECK FIREMEN'S MUTUAL BENEVOLENT ASSOCIATION, LOCAL NO. 42, Respondent-Respondent.

Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided October 1, 2003.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jeffrey M. Daitz, argued the cause for appellant (Peckar & Abramson, attorneys; Mr. Daitz, David Lew, and Elana Ben-Dov, River Edge, on the briefs).

David I. Fox, Livingston, argued the cause for respondent Teaneck Firemen's Mutual Benevolent Association, Local No. 42 (Fox & Fox, attorneys; Mr. Fox and Gregory A. Busch, of counsel and on the brief).

Robert E. Anderson, General Counsel, argued the cause for respondent New Jersey Public Employment Relations Commission (Mr. Anderson, attorney; Susan E. Galante, Deputy General Counsel, on the brief).

Bruce H. Nagel, Livingston, argued the cause for amicus curiae, New Jersey State Firemen's Mutual Benevolent Association (Nagel, Rice, Dreifuss & Mazie, attorneys).

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Collester's opinion of the Appellate Division, reported at 353 N.J.Super. 289, 802 A.2d 569 (2002).

For affirming—Chief Justice PORITZ and Justices LONG, VERNIERO, LaVECCHIA, ZAZZALI, ALBIN and WALLACE—7.

Opposed

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases