BALSTER v. WIPF

No. 22706.

672 N.W.2d 475 (2003)

2003 SD 135

Daryle BALSTER, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. Phil WIPF, Defendant and Appellant.

Supreme Court of South Dakota.

Decided November 25, 2003.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ron J. Volesky, Wessington Springs, Attorney for plaintiff and appellee.

Casey N. Bridgman of Bridgman and Adel, Huron, Attorneys for defendant and appellant.


MEIERHENRY, Justice.

[¶ 1.] Daryle Balster and Phil Wipf had various business arrangements involving farming and livestock. Balster brought this action claiming nonpayment of rent. Wipf counterclaimed alleging breach of express and implied contract. Balster filed a summary judgment motion. Wipf appeals the summary judgment dismissing his counterclaim. We reverse.

FACTS

[¶ 2.] In 1996 and 1997, Balster and Wipf had express contracts relating...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases