IN THE MATTER OF PARRISH

02C17956; A119494

72 P.3d 1066 (2003)

188 Or. App. 663

In the Matter of Joseph Parrish, Alleged to be a Mentally Ill Person. STATE of Oregon, Respondent, v. Joseph PARRISH, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided July 16, 2003.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Andrew P. Ositis, Salem, filed the brief for appellant.

Hardy Myers, Attorney General, Mary H. Williams, Solicitor General, and David F. Coursen, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.

Before HASELTON, Presiding Judge, and LINDER and WOLLHEIM, Judges.


PER CURIAM.

Appellant appeals his involuntary civil commitment on the ground that there is insufficient evidence to support the trial court's conclusion that he is unable to provide for his basic personal needs. ORS 426.005(1)(d)(B). The state concedes that the evidence in the record is insufficient to meet the requisite "clear and convincing" evidentiary standard. ORS 426.130. Having reviewed the record, we conclude that the state's concession is well founded and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases