SAIF CORP. v. ROSS

H00-111 and H00-041; A118745.

82 P.3d 1035 (2003)

191 Or. App. 212

SAIF CORPORATION and Terminal Transfer, Inc., Petitioners, v. Paul E. ROSS and Department of Consumer & Business Services, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided December 10, 2003.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jerome P. Larkin argued the cause and filed the briefs for petitioners. Nelson R. Hall argued the cause for respondent Paul E. Ross. With him on the brief was Bennett, Hartman, Morris & Kaplan, LLP.

Richard D. Wasserman, Assistant Attorney General, waived appearance for respondent Department of Consumer and Business Services.

Before EDMONDS, Presiding Judge, and WOLLHEIM and SCHUMAN, Judges.


SCHUMAN, J.

The Director of the Department of Consumer and Business Services (director) issued an order requiring petitioner SAIF Corporation (SAIF) to pay for claimant's chiropractic treatment, concluding that claimant had provided SAIF with an adequate treatment plan even though different components of the plan came to SAIF in separate documents. SAIF seeks judicial review, arguing that the relevant rule requires a plan submitted in a single document signed by claimant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases