JACKSON v. CAREY

No. 01-17126.

353 F.3d 750 (2003)

Charles R. JACKSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Tom L. CAREY; R. Papac, Lt.; J. Marshall; A. Davis; E. Padilla; Burton; R. Lieberman, Doctor, Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Filed December 24, 2003.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gail Johnson (argued) and Daniel H. Bookin, O'Melveny & Myers LLP, San Francisco, California, for the plaintiff-appellant.

Song Hill, Deputy Attorney General (argued), Bill Lockyer, Attorney General, Robert R. Anderson, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Paul D. Gifford, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Allen R. Crown, Supervising Deputy Attorney General, San Francisco, California, for the defendants-appellees.

Before Harry PREGERSON, C. Arlen BEAM, and Richard A. PAEZ, Circuit Judges.


Argued and Submitted October 9, 2003 — San Francisco, California.

OPINION

BEAM, Circuit Judge.

Inmate Charles Jackson filed a complaint in federal district court, claiming that defendants Carey, Papac, Marshall, Davis, and Padilla (collectively "the prison officials") violated his constitutional rights when they allowed his transfer to Corcoran-Security Housing Unit (Corcoran-SHU) after his successful appeal, which ordered the reissue and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases