1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 82 P.3d
  5. 82 P.3d 1015 (2003)
 

STATE INS. FUND v. ACCORD HUMAN RESOURCES

No. 98,621.

82 P.3d 1015 (2003)

2003 OK 109

STATE of Oklahoma, ex rel. STATE INSURANCE FUND, now known as Compsource Oklahoma, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. ACCORD HUMAN RESOURCES, INC., Carl Edwards, Dale Hageman, and Ford C. Price, Jr., Defendants/Appellees.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma.

As Corrected January 6 and 12, 2004.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

W. Rogers Abbott, II, Abbott & Associates, Oklahoma City, OK, for Plaintiff/Appellant.

Joseph Walters, McAfee & Taft, Oklahoma City, OK, for Defendant/Appellee.

SUMMERS, J.

¶ 1 This controversy presents two questions. The first, whether the State Insurance Fund1 (Fund) is entitled to an attorney's fee, must be answered in the negative due to our recent opinion in State of Oklahoma, ex rel. State Insurance Fund v. Great Plains Center, Inc., 2003 OK 79, 78 P.3d 83. The second is whether the Fund is entitled...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases