1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 824 A.2d
  5. 824 A.2d 264 (2003)
 

FLETT ASSOCIATES v. S.D. CATALANO

824 A.2d 264 (2003)

361 N.J. Super. 127

FLETT ASSOCIATES, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. S.D. CATALANO, INC., Defendant-Appellant.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided June 11, 2003.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bruce M. Sattin, Bordentown, argued the cause for appellant (Szaferman, Lakind, Blumstein, Blader, Lehmann & Goldshore, attorneys; Mr. Sattin, on the brief).

John W. O'Brien argued the cause for respondent (Nolan & Associates, attorneys; Mr. O'Brien, on the brief).

Before Judges SKILLMAN, CUFF and WINKELSTEIN.

The opinion of the court was delivered by SKILLMAN, P.J.A.D.

This appeal requires us to determine the standard that governs a motion for relaxation of the thirty-day period allowed under Rule 4:21A-6(b)(1) for service of a trial de novo demand when the demand has been filed in a timely manner.

Plaintiff Flett Associates brought this action for the recovery of $28,343.31 in fees for engineering services provided to defendant S.D. Catalano. Defendant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases