OPINION
HARTEN, Judge.
Appellants were tried separately on stipulated facts and convicted separately under Minn.Stat. § 617.247 (1999) of possession of pictorial representations of minors. In this consolidated appeal, both challenge the constitutionality of that statute.
FACTS
Appellant Kristopher Fingal was charged with possessing child pornography in violation of Minn.Stat. § 617.247 (2000). He moved to dismiss the charges on...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.