DONG v. ALAPE


824 A.2d 251 (2003)

361 N.J. Super. 106

Kayhan DONG, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Michael T. ALAPE, Defendant-Respondent.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided June 9, 2003.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William S. Winters, argued the cause for appellant.

Robert S. Helwig, New Brunswick, argued the cause for respondent (Hoagland, Longo, Moran, Dunst & Doukas, attorneys; Mr. Helwig, of counsel; J. Silvio Mascolo, on the brief).

William M. Dellicato, for amicus curiae Mothers Against Drunk Driving.

Before Judges KING, LISA and FUENTES.


The opinion of the court was delivered by LISA, J.A.D.

We consider in this appeal whether plaintiff, who was injured by an allegedly intoxicated hit-and-run driver, presented sufficient evidence to warrant submission of a punitive damages claim to the jury. After conducting a pre-trial N.J.R.E. 104(a) hearing, the trial judge concluded that, although evidence existed that defendant consumed some alcohol prior to the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases