MILLER, Judge.
Following a bench trial, Ronald Hill was found guilty of burglary. He appeals, arguing in his sole enumeration of error that the evidence was insufficient to sustain the conviction.
On appeal, the evidence must be viewed in the light most favorable to support the verdict, and appellant no longer enjoys a presumption of innocence; an appellate court determines evidence sufficiency and does not weigh the evidence or determine witness
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
