STIRLING v. SCHAFER


196 Misc.2d 878 (2003)

763 N.Y.S.2d 878

RAMSEY STIRLING et al., Respondents, v. JAMES F. SCHAFER et al., Appellants, et al., Defendant.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department.

July 7, 2003.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Martyn, Toher, Esposito & Martyn, Mineola (Catherine M. Martyn of counsel), for appellants.

Ressler & Ressler, New York City (David Paul Horowitz of counsel), for respondents.

WINICK, J.P., LIFSON and SKELOS, JJ., concur.


OPINION OF THE COURT

MEMORANDUM.

Order unanimously reversed without costs and matter remanded to the court below for a determination de novo of appellants' motion for summary judgment.

Defendants Schafer and Hassleo moved for summary judgment on the ground that the plaintiffs did not satisfy the requirement of suffering a serious injury under Insurance Law § 5102 (d). The court denied the motion...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases