1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 107 P.3d
  5. 107 P.3d 965 (2003)
 

JIMINEZ v. INDUSTRIAL CLAIM APPEALS OFFICE

No. 02CA2283.

107 P.3d 965 (2003)

Maxie JIMINEZ, Petitioner, v. INDUSTRIAL CLAIM APPEALS OFFICE OF the STATE OF COLORADO, Pinnacol Assurance, and Amax Henderson Project, Respondents.

Colorado Court of Appeals, Div. II.

September 11, 2003.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Roger Fraley, Jr., Denver, Colorado, for Petitioner.

No Appearance for Respondent Industrial Claim Appeals Office.

Ruegsegger Thomas, LLC, Douglas A. Thomas, Merrily S. Archer, Denver, Colorado, for Respondents Pinnacol Assurance and Amax Henderson Project.

Opinion by Judge CASEBOLT.

Maxie Jiminez (claimant) seeks review of a final order of the Industrial Claim Appeals Office (Panel) denying his claim for penalties against employer, Amax Henderson Project, and its insurer, Pinnacol Assurance (collectively Pinnacol). We affirm.

In an underlying order in 2000, an administrative law judge (ALJ) found Pinnacol liable to claimant for additional temporary total disability (TTD) benefits beyond what it had previously...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases