1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 67 P.3d
  5. 67 P.3d 991 (2003)
 

EMPLOYMENT DEPT. v. CLARK

01-AB-2093, A117262.

67 P.3d 991 (2003)

187 Or. App. 431

EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT, Petitioner, v. Anthony I. CLARK and the Office Depot, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided May 1, 2003.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David F. Coursen, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were Hardy Myers, Attorney General, and Mary H. Williams, Solicitor General.

No appearance for respondents.

Before EDMONDS, Presiding Judge, and KISTLER and SCHUMAN, Judges.

EDMONDS, P.J.

The Employment Department (department) seeks review of a decision of the Employment Appeals Board (board). The department asserts that the board incorrectly interpreted ORS 657.310. We agree and reverse.

Claimant Anthony Clark filed a claim for unemployment benefits in December 2000 and was awarded a weekly benefit of $376. While collecting benefits, claimant began working part time for Office Depot. On several occasions, claimant under reported...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases