1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 351 F.3d
  5. 351 F.3d 697 (2003)
 

AMMEX, INC. v. COX

Nos. 01-2392, 01-2518.

351 F.3d 697 (2003)

AMMEX, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v. Michael A. COX, Defendant-Appellee/Cross-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Decided and Filed: December 3, 2003.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

ARGUED: Craig L. John, DYKEMA GOSSETT, Bloomfield Hills, Michigan, for Appellant.

Tracy A. Sonneborn, (argued and briefed), Office of the Attorney General of Michigan Consumer Protection Division, Lansing, Michigan, for Appellee.

ON BRIEF: David D. Smyth III (briefed), William W. Koegel, Jr., Steptoe & Johnson, Washington, DC, Craig L. John (argued), Dykema Gossett, Bloomfield Hills, MI, for Appellant.

Before BATCHELDER and ROGERS, Circuit Judges; RUSSELL, District Judge.

Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206

OPINION

ROGERS, Circuit Judge.

The Attorney General of Michigan issued a Notice of Intended Action ("NIA") to Ammex, Inc. informing it that its advertising might result in the Attorney General filing an enforcement action under the Michigan Consumer Protection Act ("MCPA"). In response, Ammex sought a declaratory judgment against the Attorney General, asserting that the Attorney General could not enforce the MCPA...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases