GUERCIO v. PRODUCTION AUTOMATION CORP.

No. C1-02-2140.

664 N.W.2d 379 (2003)

Fred GUERCIO, Appellant, v. PRODUCTION AUTOMATION CORPORATION, et al., Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

June 24, 2003.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Steve G. Heikens, Minneapolis, MN, for appellant.

Kerry L. Middleton, Erik F. Hansen, Fafinski, Mark & Johnson, P.A., Eden Prairie, MN, for respondents.

Considered and decided by ANDERSON, Presiding Judge, SCHUMACHER, Judge, and WILLIS, Judge.


OPINION

G. BARRY ANDERSON, Judge.

In this employment dispute, appellant challenges summary judgment arguing that genuine issues of material fact exist indicating that (a) respondent Production Automation Corporation (PAC) breached its employment contract with appellant by lowering commission rates from 50% to 40%, (b) PAC breached its contract with appellant by failing to pay him commissions after his termination, (c) PAC breached implied and express covenants...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases