1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 62 P.3d
  5. 62 P.3d 976 (2003)
 

ZIMMERMAN v. SHAKMAN

No. 1 CA-CV 02-0012.

62 P.3d 976 (2003)

204 Ariz. 231

Richard B. ZIMMERMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Robert SHAKMAN, Defendant-Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department C.

February 11, 2003.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Renaud, Cook & Drury, P.A. By Michael Salcido, Phoenix, Attorneys for Appellant.

Kessler Law Offices By Eric W. Kessler, Mesa, Attorney for Appellee.

OPINION

IRVINE, Judge.

¶ 1 Richard Zimmerman challenges the trial court's order dismissing this case. In the proceedings below, the trial court granted Robert Shakman's motion in limine to preclude the introduction of evidence by Zimmerman. Shakman then moved to dismiss the complaint on the grounds that Zimmerman could not prove his case at trial because he could not introduce evidence. The trial court...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases