ROSEN v. CORVALON, M.D.


309 A.D.2d 723 (2003)

766 N.Y.S.2d 555

DENISE ROSEN, Appellant, v. JOSE CORVALON, M.D., Respondent, et al., Defendants. (And a Third-Party Action.)

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

Decided October 30, 2003.


The refusal to strike defendant's answer for failure to appear at scheduled depositions was within the court's broad discretion in the supervision of disclosure (see Nitz v Prudential-Bache Sec., 102 A.D.2d 914, 915 [1984]). As we have noted, "a court should not resort to striking an answer for failure to comply with discovery directives unless noncompliance is clearly established to be both deliberate and contumacious * * *. Moreover...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases