1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 261 Wis.2d
  5. 261 Wis.2d 769 (2003)
 

SCHONSCHECK v. PACCAR, INC.

No. 02-1413.

261 Wis.2d 769 (2003)

2003 WI App 79

661 N.W.2d 476

Gary SCHONSCHECK, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. PACCAR, INC., d/b/a Kenworth Truck Company, Defendant-Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin.

Decided March 4, 2003.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

On behalf of the defendant-appellant, the cause was submitted on the briefs of Frank J. Daily, Patrick W. Schmidt, Jeffrey O. Davis and Patrick S. Nolan of Quarles & Brady, LLP, Milwaukee.

On behalf of the defendant-respondent, the cause was submitted on the brief of Mark Romano of Consumer Legal Services, Elm Grove.

A nonparty brief was filed by James E. Doyle, attorney general, and Stephen J. Nicks, assistant attorney general.

Before Cane, C.J., Hoover, P.J., and Peterson, J.

¶ 1. PETERSON, J.

Kenworth Truck Company appeals a judgment finding it in violation of Wisconsin's lemon law, WIS. STAT. § 218.0171.1 Kenworth argues: (1) Gary Schonscheck's demand failed to satisfy the statutory requirements of the lemon law because it did not specifically indicate what form of relief was demanded; (2) Kenworth is not liable for components that it did not manufacture and that were excluded from its express warranty...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases