1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.Rptr.2d
  4. 129 Cal.Rptr.2d
  5. 129 Cal.Rptr.2d 892 (2003)
 

DECKER v. U.D. REGISTRY, INC.,

No. G030094.

129 Cal.Rptr.2d 892 (2003)

105 Cal.App.4th 1382

Isabel DECKER et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. The U.D. REGISTRY, INC., et al., Defendants and Appellants.

Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division Three.

Rehearing Denied March 11, 2003.

As Modified February 11, 2003.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Enenstein, Russell & Saltz, Michael J. Saltz, Jason M. Russell, Darren S. Enenstein and Jeffrey R. Glassman, Los Angeles, for Defendant and Appellant The U.D. Registry, Inc.

Harvey A. Saltz, in pro. per., for Defendant and Appellant.

Lakeshore Law Center and Jeffrey Wilens, Mission Viejo, for Plaintiffs and Respondents.

OPINION

FYBEL, J.

The U.D. Registry, Inc. (UDR), and Harvey A. Saltz appeal from an order denying UDR's special motions to strike the complaint pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 425.16 (all further code references are to the Code of Civil Procedure unless otherwise indicated) and awarding plaintiffs attorney fees pursuant to subdivision (c) of section 425.16. Section 425.16, commonly referred to as the anti-SLAPP statute,1

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases