1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 664 N.W.2d
  5. 664 N.W.2d 355 (2003)
 

RAY v. MILLER MEESTER ADVERTISING, INC.

No. C3-02-1605.

664 N.W.2d 355 (2003)

Patricia Ludowese RAY, Respondent, v. MILLER MEESTER ADVERTISING, INC., Appellant, Robert V. Miller, Defendant.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

June 16, 2003.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Susan M. Coler, Teresa K. Patton, Sprenger & Lang, PLLC, Minneapolis, MN, for respondent.

Joseph W. Anthony, Mary L. Knoblauch, Anthony Ostlund & Baer, P.A., Minneapolis, MN, for appellant.

Donald H. Nichols, Nichols, Kaster & Anderson, PLLP, Minneapolis, MN, for amicus curiae National Employment Lawyers Association.

Considered and decided by RANDALL, Presiding Judge, SHUMAKER, Judge, and HUSPENI, Judge.

OPINION

GORDON W. SHUMAKER, Judge.

The district court simultaneously conducted a bench trial on claims of gender discrimination brought under the Minnesota Human Rights Act (MHRA) and a jury trial on claims brought under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII). Both the district court and the jury concluded that appellant Miller Meester Advertising, Inc. (MMA) had engaged in unlawful gender...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases