1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 61 P.3d
  5. 61 P.3d 955 (2003)
 

RUSSELL v. DEERE & CO.

99-01427-CV; A114045.

61 P.3d 955 (2003)

186 Or. App. 78

Michael RUSSELL, Appellant, v. DEERE & COMPANY, a Delaware corporation, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided January 29, 2003.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kenneth M. Tharp, Medford, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the briefs was Frohnmayer, Deatherage, Pratt, Jamieson, Clarke & Moore, P.C.

Timothy C. Gerking, Medford, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Brophy, Mills, Schmor, Gerking & Brophy, LLP.

Before HASELTON, Presiding Judge, and DEITS, Chief Judge, and LINDER, Judge.

LINDER, J.

This appeal arises out of a product liability action involving a defective combine. The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of defendant Deere & Company on the ground that plaintiff had not presented evidence sufficient to create a jury question as to whether the combine was unreasonably dangerous to persons or property. See ORS 30.920. In reviewing plaintiff's challenge to that ruling on appeal...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases