1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.E.2d
  4. 788 N.E.2d
  5. 788 N.E.2d 216 (2003)
 

INPHOTO SURVEILLANCE, INC. v. CROWE, CHIZEK & CO.

No. 1-02-2629.

788 N.E.2d 216 (2003)

338 Ill. App.3d 929

272 Ill.Dec. 912

INPHOTO SURVEILLANCE, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CROWE, CHIZEK AND COMPANY, LLP, Defendant-Appellant.

Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, Sixth Division.

March 31, 2003.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael T. Hannafan and Nicholas A. Pavich of Michael T. Hannafan & Associates, Ltd., Chicago, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Gino L. DiVito and Gary L. Prior of Tabet DiVito & Rothstein LLC, Chicago, for Defendant-Appellant.

Justice TULLY delivered the opinion of the court:

This case reaches us for resolution of certified questions pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 308 (155 Ill.2d R. 308). Plaintiff, Inphoto Surveillance, Inc., filed a complaint against defendant, Crowe, Chizek and Company, LLP, alleging that defendant negligently rendered accounting advice regarding plaintiffs liability for sales taxes in the state of New York. Plaintiff alleged that as a result of the negligent advice...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases