SACKETT v. SANTILLI

No. 70163-6.

47 P.3d 948 (2002)

146 Wash.2d 498

Russell and Carolyn SACKETT, Respondents, v. Thomas A. SANTILLI, Petitioner.

Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

Decided June 13, 2002.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Leonard Flanagan, Sheila McGaughey, Bellevue, Wiggins Law Offices, Charles Wiggins, Kenneth Masters, Bainbridge, for Petitioner.

Peery, Hiscock, Pierson & Ryder, Charles Peery, David Corey, Seattle, for Respondents.

Bryan Harnetiaux, Debra Stephens, Spokane, amicus curiae on behalf of Wash. State Trial Lawyers Assoc.


IRELAND, J.

Defendant driver Thomas A. Santilli contends that CR 38(d), which provides that a party's failure to perfect demand for a jury trial in accord with CR 38(b) implies that party's consent to the waiver of the right to a jury, is unconstitutional under article I, section 21 of our state constitution. Santilli claims the constitution vests the legislature with the exclusive power to "provide for ... waiving of the jury in civil cases." Const. art. 1, §...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases