1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 38 P.3d
  5. 38 P.3d 956 (2002)
 

CITIZENS AGAINST IRRESPONS. GROWTH v. METRO

99-007; A113961.

38 P.3d 956 (2002)

179 Or. App. 12

CITIZENS AGAINST IRRESPONSIBLE GROWTH, Steven Larrance, Walter Hellman, and Rick VanBeveren, Petitioners, v. METRO and City of Hillsboro, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided January 23, 2002.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lawrence R. Derr, Portland, argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the brief was Josselson, Potter & Roberts.

Larry S. Shaw, Portland, argued the cause and filed the brief for respondent Metro.

Timothy J. Sercombe, Portland, argued the cause for respondent City of Hillsboro. With him on the brief were William K. Kabeiseman and Preston Gates & Ellis LLP.

Before HASELTON, Presiding Judge, and DEITS, Chief Judge, and LINDER, Judge.

DEITS, C.J.

Petitioners1 seek judicial review of a LUBA final opinion and order affirming a Metropolitan Service District (Metro) amendment of the urban growth boundary (UGB) for the Portland metropolitan area south of the City of Hillsboro. We affirm.

The relevant facts are taken from LUBA's order and the record below. Citizens Against Irresponsible Growth v. Metro, 39 Or. LUBA 539 (2001). ORS 197.296 (1999) required that...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases