Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant's contention that the conduct of his codefendant's attorney during the trial was prejudicial to him is unpreserved for appellate review (see CPL 470.05 [2]), and, in any event, is without merit (cf. People v Taylor,
Upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.