STATE v. TORGRIMSON

No. C2-01-905.

637 N.W.2d 345 (2002)

STATE of Minnesota, Respondent, v. Aaron Timothy TORGRIMSON, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

January 2, 2002.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mike Hatch, Attorney General, St. Paul, MN; and Steven M. Tallen, Maple Grove City Attorney, Tallen Baertschi, Minneapolis, MN, for respondent.

Robert D. Miller, Robert D. Miller and Associates, Minneapolis, MN, for appellant.

Considered and decided by KLAPHAKE, Presiding Judge, SCHUMACHER, Judge, and PETERSON, Judge.


OPINION

SCHUMACHER, Judge.

Appellant Aaron Timothy Torgrimson challenges the district court's pretrial evidentiary ruling denying his motion to suppress surreptitiously taped statements he made while talking with another suspect in the back seat of a police vehicle. Torgrimson contends that (1) the surreptitious taping violates his Fourth Amendment rights, and (2) failure to suppress the statements violates Minn.Stat. § 626A.04 (2000). We affirm.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases