KLUTSENBEKER v. JACKSON COUNTY

98-06559, 98-04553, 97-07040; A112885.

57 P.3d 925 (2002)

185 Or.App. 96

In the Matter of the Compensation of Charles F. Klutsenbeker, Jr., Claimant. Charles F. KLUTSENBEKER, Jr., Petitioner, v. JACKSON COUNTY, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided November 13, 2002.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert F. Webber, Medford, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were Arthur W. Stevens and Black, Chapman, Webber & Stevens.

Damon L. Vickers, McMinnville, argued the cause for respondent. On the brief were Brian M. Solodky and Cummins, Goodman, Fish, Denley & Vickers, P.C.

Before EDMONDS, Presiding Judge, and KISTLER and SCHUMAN, Judges.


SCHUMAN, J.

Claimant requested that employer expand the scope of two claim acceptances, each relating to a separate employment-related back injury. Employer denied the requests. An administrative law judge (ALJ) and then the Workers' Compensation Board (board) affirmed. Claimant seeks judicial review. We affirm the denial of one request and, on the other denial, we reverse and remand for reconsideration.

On April 16, 1997, claimant experienced back pain while...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases