1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.W.3d
  4. 74 S.W.3d
  5. 74 S.W.3d 906 (2002)
 

HOFFMAN, McBRYDE & CO., P.C. v. HEYLAND

No. 05-01-00240-CV.

74 S.W.3d 906 (2002)

HOFFMAN, McBRYDE & CO., P.C. f/k/a Hoffman, Pederson & McBryde, P.C., Appellant, v. Edward HEYLAND, Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Texas, Dallas.

April 11, 2002.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard B. Schiro, Law Office of Richard B. Schiro, Dallas, for Appellant.

Alan S. Trust, Trust Law Firm, P.C., Dallas, for Appellee.

Before Justices MOSELEY, O'NEILL, and MARTIN RICHTER.

OPINION

Opinion By Justice MOSELEY.

An abstract of judgment must show, among other things, "the amount for which the judgment was rendered and the balance due ...." Tex. Prop.Code Ann. § 52.003(a)(6) (Vernon 1995) (emphasis added). In this appeal we must determine whether that requirement refers to the balance due on the date the abstract was issued or the balance due on the date the abstract was filed. We hold that an otherwise properly issued...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases