1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 58 P.3d
  5. 58 P.3d 919 (2002)
 

CASE v. DUNDOM

No. 27906-1-II.

58 P.3d 919 (2002)

Ted CASE, Respondent, v. Bary DUNDOM and "Jane Doe" Dundom, husband and wife; also any other Parties Unknown Claiming any Right, Title, Estate, Lien or Interest in the Real Estate Described in the Complaint Herein, Appellants.

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 2.

As Amended January 10, 2003.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William E. Morgan, Hoquiam, WA, for Appellants.

William Stewart, Montesano, WA, for Respondent.

BRIDGEWATER, J.

Bary Dundom appeals the trial court's default judgment against him which quieted title to certain real property in Ted Case. Dundom claims that the default award is invalid because Case did not comply with CR 26(i) before moving for discovery sanctions. We hold that, without the certification described in CR 26(i), a trial court does not have authority to entertain a motion to compel discovery. Accordingly, we reverse the trial court and vacate the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases