CHURCHILL ENVIR. PARTNERS v. ERNST & YOUNG

No. C7-01-1905.

643 N.W.2d 333 (2002)

CHURCHILL ENVIRONMENTAL AND INDUSTRIAL EQUITY PARTNERS, L.P., et al., Respondents, v. ERNST & YOUNG, L.L.P., Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

April 30, 2002.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James P. McCarthy, Terrence J. Fleming, Michael Olafson, Lindquist & Vennum, PLLP, Minneapolis, MN, for respondents.

Timothy D. Kelly, Jennifer L. Frisch, Kelly & Berens, P.A., Minneapolis, MN; and Jonathan C. Medow, Brian J. Massengill, Jeffrey W. Sarles, Mayer, Brown, Rowe & Maw, Chicago, IL, for appellant.

Considered and decided by SHUMAKER, Presiding Judge, FOLEY, Judge, and HUSPENI, Judge.


OPINION

FOLEY, Judge.

Appellant challenges the district court's order denying its motion to stay proceedings and compel arbitration, arguing that the parties agreed to arbitrate both the merits of respondents' claims and the parties' threshold dispute regarding arbitrability of those claims. Because we conclude that the parties clearly intended to arbitrate the arbitrability of respondents' claims, we reverse and remand.

FACTS

Appellant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases