1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 641 N.W.2d
  5. 641 N.W.2d 328 (2002)
 

CHANEY v. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AGENCY

Nos. C3-01-1349, C1-01-1401.

641 N.W.2d 328 (2002)

Michael CHANEY (d/b/a/ The Chaney Group) et al., Appellants, v. MINNEAPOLIS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AGENCY et al., Respondents, and Gesco, Inc., Respondent/Intervenor.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

Review Denied May 28, 2002.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Alan W. Weinblatt, Donna M. Kasbohm, St. Paul, for appellants.

Fred Burstein, William J. Maddix, Minneapolis, for respondents MCDA and the City of Minneapolis.

David Gronbeck, Minneapolis, for respondent/intervenor Gesco, Inc.

Considered and decided by HARTEN, Presiding Judge, ANDERSON, Judge, and STONEBURNER, Judge.

OPINION

G. BARRY ANDERSON, Judge.

Respondents, the City of Minneapolis and the Minneapolis Community Development Agency et al. (MCDA), published a request for proposals (RFP) inviting bids to rehabilitate certain property located in Minneapolis. Appellants, Michael and Robert Chaney, submitted a bid. Respondents did not sell the property to appellants but sold it to intervenor, Gesco, Inc.1 On the same day respondents conveyed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases