AMORESANO v. LAUFGAS


796 A.2d 164 (2002)

171 N.J. 532

Vincent AMORESANO, Chief of Police, the City of Paterson, and Passaic County Prosecutor's Office, Plaintiffs, v. Bernard LAUFGAS, Defendant-Appellant. State of New Jersey, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Bernard Laufgas, Defendant-Appellant (Two Cases).

Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided January 29, 2002.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bernard Laufgas, argued the cause pro se.

Richard W. Berg, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent (John J. Farmer, Jr., Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney).


The opinion of the Court was delivered by VERNIERO, J.

The issues raised in this appeal involve the judiciary's summary contempt power. We are called on to determine whether the trial court erred in imposing jail sentences of varying lengths on the same litigant after finding him in contempt on three separate occasions. In accordance with Rule 1:10-1, the trial court founded the first adjudication on a series of letters...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases