Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.
The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in precluding the plaintiffs' only expert medical witness from testifying since, under the circumstances of this case, such testimony would have been of no probative value (see Matott v Ward,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.