1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 650 N.W.2d
  5. 650 N.W.2d 305 (2002)
 

STATE v. LAPLANTE

Nos. 21993, 21999.

650 N.W.2d 305 (2002)

2002 SD 95

STATE of South Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. Richard Lynn LAPLANTE, Defendant and Appellant. State of South Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. Carolyn Susan Laplante, Defendant and Appellant.

Supreme Court of South Dakota.

Decided August 7, 2002.

Rehearing Denied October 15, 2002.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mark Barnett, Attorney General, Michele K. Bennett, Assistant Attorney General, Pierre, for plaintiff and appellee.

Gary Conklin, Rapid City, for defendant and appellant Richard LaPlante.

Steven Binger, Sioux Falls, Randall D.B. Tigue, Minneapolis, MN, for defendant and appellant Carolyn LaPlante.

ZINTER, Justice.

[¶ 1.] Carolyn and Richard LaPlante (Carolyn, Richard, or LaPlantes) appeal from their convictions of maintaining a place for the purpose of using, keeping, or selling controlled substances in violation of SDCL 22-42-10.1 LaPlantes' convictions arose out of their three sons' involvement in drug activity in the family home. Carolyn and Richard raise a number of issues on appeal. We address their challenge to the sufficiency...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases