1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.Rptr.2d
  4. 126 Cal.Rptr.2d
  5. 126 Cal.Rptr.2d 825 (2002)
 

BUNKER v. COUNTY OF ORANGE

No. G029383.

126 Cal.Rptr.2d 825 (2002)

103 Cal.App.4th 542

William BUNKER, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. COUNTY OF ORANGE et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division Three.

As Modified on Denial of Rehearing December 5, 2002.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Murphy Sheneman Julian & Rogers, Robert A. Julian, Michael A. Sweet, San Francisco; Cotchett, Pitre & Simon and Bruce Simon, Burlingame, for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Benjamin P. de Mayo, County Counsel, Delia M. Welch, Nicole A. Sims and Marianne Van Riper, Deputy County Counsel, for Defendants and Respondents.

OPINION

SILLS, P.J.

A classic error in debate is attacking something that your opponent hasn't said. (E.g., "Unlike my opponent Smerdley, I am in favor of the minimum wage" where poor old Smerdley has never said anything against the minimum wage.) In the case before us, the County of Orange has done a magnificent job of showing that the plaintiff cannot get relief that his complaint doesn't actually seek...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases