MAYER POLLOCK STEEL CORP. v. NJ SURPLUS LINES INS. GUARANTY FUND


800 A.2d 147 (2002)

352 N.J. Super. 269

MAYER POLLOCK STEEL CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NEW JERSEY SURPLUS LINES INSURANCE GUARANTY FUND, Defendant-Respondent.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided June 13, 2002.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jonathan B. Freedman, Cherry Hill, argued the cause for appellants (Paul & Miller, attorneys; Andrew L. Miller, of counsel and on the brief).

Mark M. Tallmadge, Florham Park, argued the cause for respondent (Bressler, Amery & Ross, attorneys; Mr. Tallmadge and Stephanie M. Hopkins, on the brief).

Before Judges HAVEY, COBURN and WEISSBARD.


The opinion of the court was delivered by HAVEY, P.J.A.D.

Plaintiff Mayer Pollock Steel Corporation appeals from a summary judgment in favor of defendant New Jersey Surplus Lines Insurance Guaranty Fund (Fund). On appeal, plaintiff argues that the trial court erred in concluding that the general liability policy, under which it is the named insured, was issued by the London Market Insurance Exchange (Lloyd's), rather than Anglo American Company Limited (Anglo American...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases