1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Conn.
  4. 68 Conn.
  5. 68 Conn. App. 879 (2002)
 

STATE v. CONSTANTOPOLOUS

(AC 20815)

68 Conn. App. 879 (2002)

STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. MICHAEL CONSTANTOPOLOUS

Appellate Court of Connecticut.

Officially released April 2, 2002.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael Constantopolous, pro se, the appellant (defendant).

Gerard P. Eisenman, senior assistant state's attorney, with whom, on the brief, was Jonathan Benedict, state's attorney, for the appellee (state).

Schaller, Bishop and Stoughton, JS.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The pro se defendant, Michael Constantopolous, appeals from the order of the trial court denying his motion to correct an illegal sentence. The defendant claims that (1) his sentence was illegal and (2) his sentence was imposed in an illegal manner because the court improperly advised him during his plea canvass that he would be eligible for parole.1 We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases