FREIMARK & THURSTON AGENCY v. NATIONAL CITY BANK

No. C-3-99-427.

231 F.Supp.2d 713 (2002)

FREIMARK & THURSTON AGENCY, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. NATIONAL CITY BANK OF DAYTON, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division.

September 5, 2002.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Don Allen Little, Little, Duncan & Depoorter, Dayton, OH, for Plaintiffs.

Douglas Michael Kennedy, Roetzel & Andress, Columbus, OH, Paul L. Jackson, Roetzel & Andress, Akron, OH, Alan Howard Abes, Dinsmore & Shohl, Cincinnati, OH, for Defendants.


DECISION AND ENTRY SUSTAINING DEFENDANT BRANSFORD'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. # 28) AND OVERRULING DEFENDANT NATIONAL CITY'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. # 30)

RICE, Chief Judge.

Plaintiffs in this dispute are Freimark & Thurston Agency, Inc., and its principals (collectively "Freimark"). Defendants are the National City Bank of Dayton ("National City") and the Bransford Retirement Plans Services, Inc. ("Bransford").

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases