1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 833 A.2d
  5. 833 A.2d 102 (2002)
 

POPWELL v. LAW OFFICES OF BROOME

833 A.2d 102 (2002)

363 N.J. Super. 404

Joyce A. POPWELL, Plaintiff v. LAW OFFICES OF BROOME AND HORN, Defendant.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division.

November 22, 2002.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joyce A. Popwell, plaintiff pro se.

John A. Mercer, Jr., for defendants (Swartz, Campbell & Detweiler, Attorneys).

PERSKIE, J.S.C.

Plaintiff Joyce Popwell ("Popwell") brings this motion for summary judgment. In her complaint Popwell alleges that Defendants committed legal malpractice in a prior matter by failing to file, in a timely fashion, an application for a trial de novo following an arbitration proceeding that had resulted in a determination of "no cause for action." Popwell alleges that, according to the medical reports filed in that action, she sustained nerve damage...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases