1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.W.3d
  4. 64 S.W.3d
  5. 64 S.W.3d 866 (2002)
 

VEASLEY v. STATE

No. ED 78655.

64 S.W.3d 866 (2002)

Lawrence VEASLEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.

January 15, 2002.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kent Denzel, Asst. Public Defender, Columbia, MO, for Appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, Anne E. Edgington, Asst. Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.

Before MARY R. RUSSELL, P.J., and SIMON and MARY K. HOFF, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Lawrence Veasley, movant, appeals the motion court's denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. On appeal, movant contends that the motion court erred in denying his motion because the trial court failed to comply with the requirements of Rule 24.02(b)3 by personally advising him and ensuring that he understood that, if he chose not to plead guilty, he would have the right to cross-examine...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases